Hi all,
A colleague of mine is currently appealing against his redundancy notice period given as one week. He has worked here for a year and a half.
His contract states that: "You are required to give notice of termination of employment of not less than 4 weeks or as mutually agreed. You are entitled to receive notice of termination of employment in line with current legislation.”
The BERR Redundancy consultation and notification - Employment Policy & Legislation states in the “(d) When do the redundancy notices take effect?” portion of the “What does the consultation process mean in practice?” section:
“Redundancy notices take effect at the end of the employee’s contractual or statutory notice period (whichever is the greater).”
Can we argue that his contract is 4 weeks notice and statutory is one week and therefore the notice period should be 4 weeks, being the greater of the two?
Thanks
DB
Contractual Vs Statutory Notice Period
- 22-04-09, 03:56 PM #1duncanbuckley
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 1
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Contractual Vs Statutory Notice Period
- 29-04-09, 12:11 PM #2Peter Etherington
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire
- Posts
- 146
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 76 Times in 68 Posts
Hi Duncan
I am afraid that his contractual notice period on dismissal is the same as statutory (i.e. one week). It is unfair for the employer to insist on 4 weeks on resignation but not unlawful.
regards
Pete
Please share us with friends or colleagues!
Similar Threads
-
Length of Service, Redundancy, Trial Period, Notice Period
in EMPLOYEES Ask redundancy questions -
Contractual notice period
in EMPLOYEES Ask redundancy questions -
3 months contractual notice over redundancy notice
in EMPLOYEES Ask redundancy questions -
Can I still claim statutory redundancy if I am working my notice?
in EMPLOYEES Ask redundancy questions -
Statutory Trial Period Notice
in EMPLOYEES Ask redundancy questions




Reply With Quote








